Jose Canseco Loses a Finger, While Daniel Colman Wags One at Hellmuth

Retired MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) within a poker competition week that is last.

Jose Canseco was the figure that is central a weekend for the poker world which was filled with fingers: some lost, some pointed at prominent names into the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he seemingly have lost the finger that is same the next time in about a month, something which few people (with any luck) will ever get to experience.

In belated October, Canseco was in the news headlines for inadvertently shooting himself in the hand. According to Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleansing their weapon in their kitchen. He finished up shooting his finger, which then needed to be surgically reattached. It appears some surgeons are more skilled than other people at digital fixes, however.

Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament

In accordance with a tweet sent out by Canseco on Friday, nonetheless, the finger became detached once more while he was playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening.

‘ I happened to be playing in a poker tournament night that is last my little finger dropped of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video from it.’

Thankfully, Canseco didn’t post that video, though there clearly was at least one supposed image of his finger before it dropped off. As gruesome while the event may sound, however, Canseco said that this result may have been inescapable from the time he shot himself.

‘My hand should have been amputated right from the start,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was really loose with no bone tissue to get in touch it. It was also smelling actually bad.’

There ended up being no expressed word on whether or not Canseco won the hand to create up for losing the hand. Formerly, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during their 17-year major league profession as being a professional baseball player, during which he hit 462 house runs.

Colman Provides Hellmuth the Communicative Finger

Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly connected, of his or her own at 13-time global World Series of Poker bracelet champion Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some harsh comments about Hellmuth in a thread about the latter’s recent appearance on a podcast hosted by Rounders journalist Brian Koppelman.

‘Its embarrassing that individuals have to share our profession with whores like this person,’ Colman wrote. ‘he immediately comes on stage to shake my hand in front of a camera and congratulate me after I win one drop. As though he’s the gatekeeper to your poker world and welcoming me inside.

‘It is truly pathetic that a 40 year old would behave the way he does at the table, not to mention how spineless he is, simply willing to take any sponsorship regardless of the organization’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on. ‘ Really makes me personally unfortunate to think there’s a chance some individuals may look as much as this charlatan. People of their mindset and character are really a cancer for this global globe.’

Hellmuth was evidently surprised and hurt by the remarks, and responded shortly to them on Twitter.

‘Ouch, I was just assaulted time that is big a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal and it hurts, but I am proud for the man I will be!’

For his part, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was too harsh, and made a decision to back the tone off of his post, even if he stood behind the message.

‘I acknowledge to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of the message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘That being said, we still stand by the main gist of my post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I also don’t think it belongs in this game.’

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver claims that US sports that are legal must certanly be regulated in america. (Image: USATSI)

Can appropriate US sports betting, across the board, ever be a thing? a proponent that is surprising emerged in the shape of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.

Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The nyc Times recently, stating that he believes it’s time to allow sports wagering to legally take place through the United States. That stance is in opposition compared to that on most major sports organizations in the USA, including the previously held place by the NBA and its commissioner that is former Stern.

‘Betting on professional recreations is illegal in all of the usa outside of Nevada,’ Silver said from the beginning of their opinion piece. ‘we believe we require a different sort of approach.’

Currently Illegal in Most States

Silver went on to describe the current state of sports betting in the united states.

In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that already had some kind of the betting available. Nevada could be the state that is only full recreations betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon have the proper to offer more restricted forms of sports-based gambling.

The NBA, along with other sports leagues and organizations in the US, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing sports betting for decades as silver states. But who hasn’t stopped individuals from gambling on the games, no matter what the lack of the appropriate, regulated option.

‘But despite appropriate restrictions, sports gambling is extensive,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving underground company that runs free from regulation or oversight. Because there are few appropriate options available, those who wish to bet resort to bookmaking that is illicit and shady overseas websites.’

According to Silver, some estimates place the volume of illegal activities gambling into the united states of america at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per 12 months. That dwarfs the amount of legal sports betting that takes place in Las Vegas casinos and other locations in Nevada.

Trends Point Towards Regulation

Into the piece, Silver writes about the ‘domestic and global trends’ towards regulation of activities betting. He points out that many states now offer at least some form of legal gambling, and that online gambling had been controlled in three states. As a result, he says, it’s time for Congress to enact laws that are new replace PASPA.

‘Congress should adopt a federal framework that allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, subject to strict regulatory requirements and technological safeguards,’ he wrote.

Silver has previously made responses suggesting he would be enthusiastic about seeing regulated sports wagering in the usa, though here is the time that is first has laid out his position in full. Other sports leagues declined to discuss Silver’s stance.

Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance

Nonetheless, a minumum of one NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told that ‘Adam has it exactly right.’

‘In the past for PR reasons, we have put up token resistance to them,’ Cuban stated. ‘I agree with Adam that now could be the time to take sports betting out of the shadows and deal along with it like the huge business it is.’

slot machine called quick hits

Despite Silver’s feedback, however, New Jersey should not expect the NBA to take out of the lawsuit that is aiming to stop the continuing state from allowing activities betting to carry on at its casinos and racetracks.

‘Without a comprehensive solution that is federal state measures such as for example New Jersey’s recent effort will be both unlawful and bad general public policy,’ Silver composed.

Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson Online Poker Ban Plan

Ron Paul laid out his arguments against an online gambling ban that is strongly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)

Ron Paul has used his column that is weekly for Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of Americans and would be taken up limited to the advantage of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.

The former Republican Representative from Texas called such legislation an example of ‘cronyism,’ one thing he states that many Americans are against regardless of their political ideologies.

‘For instance, Congress may soon vote on legislation Internet that is outlawing gambling’ Paul had written.

‘It is a secret that is open at least inside the Beltway, that this legislation is being considered as a favor to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, whom could very well be most commonly known for using their enormous wealth to advance a pro-war international policy, is now using his political influence to turn their online rivals into criminals.’

Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March

Paul’s words make reference to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that ended up being introduced by Republicans both in homely homes of Congress in March, and it has since chosen up small but notable levels of bipartisan support in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw most forms of on the web gambling during the level that is federal essentially changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just sports betting, as it happens to be interpreted.

Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the reasons that are various for supporting the ban in an effort to show it was really just being considered for the sake of Adelson.

‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are inspired with a desire to curry favor with a donor that is wealthy’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they give a quantity of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some declare that legalizing online gambling will enrich crooks and even terrorists! But criminalizing casinos that are online not eliminate the demand for online casinos. Rather, passage of this legislation will likely guarantee that the online gambling marketplace is controlled by criminals.’

Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument

One of the( that is major to numerous, perplexing) arguments used by supporters of RAWA is that such a ban would really protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying down his thinking for why it was faulty.

‘Their argument is citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get those laws around by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul claimed. ‘ Regardless if the argument had merit that enabling states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it will never justify legislation that is federal the issue…arguing that ‘states rights’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which was intended to restrict federal power, on its mind.’

Paul presented several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing his opposition to an online gambling ban.

‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is a blatantly unconstitutional infringement on our liberties which will probably expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of all of the, it is all being done for the benefit of one effective billionaire.’

RAWA is unlikely to get a hearing or see much movement in Congress through the current lame duck session. However, its prospects could improve in the next Congress, when Republicans will have majorities in both your house and Senate.